>>127
we don't cotton to FAGS round here

>>128
we'll speedrun the whole /qa/ /lgbt/ thing and spin off another sharty of our own

>>131
questions to be answered
>1 do we quarantine fagposters into their own board?
>2 do we 'run away' ourselves into a new board, allocating ourself and others as jannies who don't want fagposting into a 'no-fag-zone' board?
>3 how restrictive do we want the default board of the site to be? do we want to filter normies by having their first impression be:
> BIG_BOSSES_GIANT_EXPOSED_CHEEKS.flac
> or do we not want to filter normies, and we leave it up to them to venture into the depths of boards that might have such things, where the default board is heavily restricted?

>>132
How do we know you’re not a closeted homo and the OP of this thread?

Make a biz and sci and g

>>132
The main issue is that site owners CAN choose what's allowed so if mr. dizzy himself doesn't wanna see fag ass it can be banned. Me personally, I say we ban porn, it just makes using an altchan far more pleasant... seen too many imageboards get destroyed by cumbrains

>>133
it can't be proved, not with ids, flags, or ip addresses. anything can be spoofed. that's why the questions are there: "now that it's there, what do we do about it?"
i want to add a feature so that anyone can hide a particular image personally (image hash filtering? or too easily bypassible since the poster could just make the tiniest change?) without hiding a whole thread, but i suppose the typical thing to do would be to just sage this thread and go to another and/or filter "bara" (btw, i had to google what that was, you're the faggot for knowing what it was before the image was approved)
/b/ rules are pretty much anything goes as long as it doesn't bring legal problems
>>134
(need to disable PDF files for sci and others, specifically that ghostscript line and anything similar)
i wonder if i should make a board request feature
had a crazy idea that users do a bit of PoW mining which generates some native token (so instead of how the sharty and others hijack your machine to mine crypto for themselves, you would be mining it for yourself), this gives them "credits" or the aforementioned tokens, and they can use those to tag posts like a booru, and boards stop really being things made by me, but might be more like sorting by OPs that have been tagged with something
so people who make /pol/-ish OPs can go to the "/pol/ board" which isn't real, but what it does do is show you OPs that PoW consensus has deemed as earning a /pol/ tag

>>137
You could just use a tripcode like moot and hiro
Banning porn altogether would make the site much easier to moderate. And allow for big brain discussions hopefully

>>139
i could've hypothetically took off the trip, posted manass, then put the trip on and said "hey look it's not me" and i think ironically putting on a trip is something only a manass enjoyer would do
it's attention-seeking and power-tripping behavior to put on a big, vibrant, flamboyant tripcode and say "hey look at me!"
i much prefer to be (loosely, you can very easily pick me out just from the content of my posts) anonymous, the same as everyone else
i'll agree that coomers obliterate quality, but offer an alternative: it might be nice if we ever want to go an ad-revenue path to have a herd of niggercattle, quarantined to their personal grazing area of hell. nobody ever said one couldn't have both a space alien and a herd of niggercattle, perhaps it's not mutually exclusive

OP here, just want to say that I would to nuke a million trannies to save a single barafag

By the way I want to upload at least small sound MP4s so that I can post Snake debating the 6 gorillion myth